Obedience to a dysfunctional novus ordo hierarchy that suppresses the rights and privileges of the Catholic Church is no virtue. Rather it is a shameful vice called servility. Prelates must obey Christ and His Church, and when they refuse, priests and laics must obey Christ and His Church for themselves. Objectively speaking, is Bergoglio bound to anyone or anything by way of obedience? Or does he get to do whatever he wants, Catholicism and consequences be damned?
How about our local prelates? Can they do or neglect anything they want? Are they bound by nothing aside from the exercise of their own will to power? And when they do brazenly act against the Faith; or, as is more often the case, shamefully neglect their duty to defend it, are Catholics bound to silent acquiescence? Does the Queen of Heaven really desire us to sit back and pretend that something Catholic is going to miraculously arise from this growing mountain of excrement that is the novus ordo church? Are we actually supposed to believe that the Incarnate Word Made Flesh is okay with a Catholic Church becoming an infidel’s mosque?
Only in the let’s hold hands and pretend mentality of the novus ordo religion are prelates presumed to wield absolute power.
And only Catholic victims of the Vatican II psy-war, both priest and laic, grovel in abject servility when a novus ordo bishop smacks down a Catholic minded priest.
Catholic Bishops are bound to protect and safeguard the Faith in their dioceses. Priests are duty bound to attend to the business of saving souls. Laics are bound to assist. Disobedience anywhere in the chain justifies not the subsequent disobedience of those beneath.
So when your Bishop allows a priest to refuse your receiving Communion on the tongue, that bishop is disobedient to Christ and His Church.
When your bishop punishes your priest for defending the Eucharist against sacrilege,
that bishop is disobedient to Christ and His Church.
When your bishop ejects your group from your own parish for having a speaker discuss communist activity in the Church, that bishop is disobedient to Christ and His Church.
When your bishop is silent as the temporal sphere attempts to enshrine into marriage the practice of unnatural vice, that bishop is disobedient to Christ and His Church.
When your bishop utters not a single syllable of support for those who put their balls on the line to battle the bloodthirsty abortion juggernaut, that bishop is disobedient to Christ and His Church.
When your bishop spreads heresy from the grounds of the chancery itself, that bishop is disobedient to Christ and His Church.
When your bishop publicly congratulates the sodomite in his crime against nature, and refuses to punish the same behavior in the diocese, that bishop is disobedient to Christ and His Church.
When a bishop so obviously and repeatedly neglects his sacred duty, he is disobedient to his Spouse the Catholic Church and ought not be obeyed. He is disobedient to the Blessed Virgin and ought not be obeyed. He is disobedient to His Master and King and ought not be obeyed.
Wherever or whenever a Catholic priest fears his bishop over preaching explicitly and repeatedly about the reality of hell, or the need of repentance against violations of Commandments Six and Nine, (mentioning every single form) or the strictness of proper disposition and posture for reception of Communion; that priest needs to put himself in a position wherein he can obey Christ when his bishop will not.
The Catholic priest needs Catholic laymen who will take him in and provide for him so he can continue his priestly ministry under the Church’s principle of Supplied Jurisdiction. Are today’s laymen up for this task? Are today’s priests? -Or are we going to watch the novus ordo religion continue to pile up its excremental mountain of heresy, sin, theft, abuse and apostasy? -And expect to escape His Wrath on day of judgement?
Let’s obey our Mother, and stop playing along with the fake church of the novus ordo religion.