Bishop in White: Conciliar Mindwar

Bishop in White Big

You get a white envelope with a page of hand-written text, the Third Secret of Fatima. What do you do? Correct, you open the ORANGE envelope from who-the-heck-knows where! And whatever calculated misdirection has been carefully inscribed therein is what you better believe. Next, forensic sleuths that we are, we read in Sister Lucy’s memoirs that out of obedience, and with graces conferred from the Queen of Heaven, the faithful Religious has written the Third Secret, placed it in an envelope, and in turn has enclosed that envelope within a certain notebook. Which of these two items will really tell us what we need to know? Correct, the notebook of course!

Now we’re onto something, but to really get to the truth we need to give an ear to the ramblings of Rome’s modernist mandarins, who, after forty years of inexplicable delays, have given us just the perspective we need to think exactly what they want us to think about the Secret. What did we get in 2000? An apocalyptic, earth-bound blood-bath starring the Bishop in White, killed at the receiving end of a fusillade of arrows and gunfire. Not to leave anything unclear, the guardians of the deposit of the Faith explain that it’s all in the past, because the Bishop in White was John Paul II, who survived being hit with a single round from a sidearm in 1981. Now, after seventeen years of such faithful truth-stewardship, two pulverized towers with 3000+ dead, millions more dead in an unending war for the greater Israel on Terror, and just last week Bergoglio’s claim that now he is the Bishop in White; what questions could possibly remain?

-As far as the apostate clergy and the Bergoglio faction care, we can ask any questions our little hearts desire about the Bishop in White, because they know the whole thing is a red-herring meant to lead us away from the truth.  However, lest we be deceived into thinking the text is just a throw-away Vatican tall-tale, it behooves us to examine what hidden purpose could lie beneath the scene.

As a necessary aside, permit my explicating a previously stated viewpoint. I believe the Third Secret to be a single text, and am very favorable to the analysis done recently by TIA (linked to this blog’s previous post). According to a hand-writing expert, the document image analyzed by TIA matches the hand-writing of texts known to be written by Sister Lucy. It is very compelling evidence. Furthermore, this text places a noose of guilt around the novus ordo religion because it depicts one who apparently is pope, praising the devil in a church gone mad. This single text of Sister Lucy’s hand-writing mentions nothing resembling what the Vatican described as the Bishop in White.

Then why present the Bishop in White to the Faithful? To deflect the hand of inescapable guilt that TIA’s version of the Secret levels at the Conciliar Church, the Bishop in White provides cover by placing the humble Bishop of Rome in the starring role of martyr-for-the-Council. Once faithful Catholics take that initial bait, the strategy of confuse, divide and conquer can commence.

What we have here, however, is something far more pernicious than a confusing academic debate over authentic sources and content. I believe that the text of the Bishop in White could be merely the first step in a larger scheme conceived by the worst enemies of the Church. For example, rather than authentic prophecy it could be a pre-scripted scene designed by wicked men who want to traumatize Catholics and manipulate them in some way to the great detriment of the Faithful. If this suspicion is correct, then the continued perpetuation of the narrative of the Bishop in White as authentic prophecy presents a danger to the faithful, most especially those just shaking the novus ordo scales from their Catholic eyes.

What is predictive programming? It seems to be a type of behavioral conditioning whereby, having placed some level of trust in one who presents a story, or information (or a purported prophecy), a subject receives subtle suggestions predetermined by the speaker, storyteller, (or clergy). The subject may be aware or unaware of the suggestion. According to behaviorist thinking, a sense of excitement or danger, as can be found in the climactic scene of a movie, can cause the subject to be more susceptible to the internalizing of predetermined suggestions. For viewers of televised so-called news reports, a heightened emotional state such as anger, fear or dread can also produce such susceptibility. Later, when presented with an actual situation upon which the predictive programming has been modeled, desired behavioral responses can more easily be induced in the subject person or population.  It has been suggested that deliberately induced psychological trauma can create even more susceptibility to suggestion and control over behavior.  A good explanation of predictive programming can be found here (but I recommend skipping the article’s embedded video)

Easily perceived as the weapon of the Global Cryptocracy’s mindwarriors, predictive programming makes me avoid going to the cinema and watching the telescreen as much as possible. This same mindwarrior’s programming strategem also makes me very suspicious of lending credence to that final and gruesome tableau of the Bishop in White.

What if those enemies of the Church, whom we know have long infiltrated and control key positions of power, be they Rosicrucians, communists, or P2 Lodge Members, were seeking to conduct a kangaroo court and summary execution of the upper hierarchy, and then send in their own agents as rescuers?

2. WE HAVE LONG PAST TAKEN CARE TO DISCREDIT THE PRIESTHOOD OF THE “GOYIM,” and thereby to ruin their mission on earth which in these days might still be a great hindrance to us. Day by day its influence on the peoples of the world is falling lower. FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE HAS BEEN DECLARED EVERYWHERE, SO THAT NOW ONLY YEARS DIVIDE US FROM THE MOMENT OF THE COMPLETE WRECKING OF THAT CHRISTIAN RELIGION

  1. When the time comes finally to destroy the papal court the finger of an invisible hand will point the nations towards this court. When, however, the nations fling themselves upon it, we shall come forward in the guise of its defenders as if to save excessive bloodshed. By this diversion we shall penetrate to its very bowels and be sure we shall never come out again until we have gnawed through the entire strength of this place. Protocol 17.2-3 of the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion

Would preset, behavioral conditioning aid in the acceptance of such false defenders as the conciliar church’s lord protectors? If such a hypothesis is in any way true, it is crucial that we keep in mind the potential harm to the faithful who might radically misconstrue as the hand of Almighty God what could very well be a man-made scheme. Their Faith could be shattered. What’s worse, innocent and unwary Catholics could find themselves not shattered but even persisting in their belief and falling under the guidance of deliberate deceivers. Under such possible circumstances, the propounding of the Bishop in White as prophecy constitutes not merely a mistake, but the transmission vector of a toxic, dangerous misconception.

What about Bergoglio’s hinting that he is the Bishop in White? He’s just being an obedient slave to his crypto-satanic superior, planting the seeds of preconditioning even deeper in the minds of unwary Catholics. But we ought be not deceived, would Bergoglio take insult, or blow or a bullet for anyone? When it all goes live, for all we know the Club of Rome has already arranged for him to retreat to a luxo-bunker somewhere in New Zealand. When they frog march some poor, chubby septuagenarian patsy through the city in ruins, Father Jorge might be on board a Gulfstream 6 winging well away from the scene. There he can indulge in any carnal activities which he has so abominably hinted at in the past.

This hypothetical horror show then, is the potential hazard to the Faith in this time already fraught with many actual perils. The Bishop in White could be a method to formally discredit and place the novus ordo religion as proxy to the Church Herself into a phony criminal proceeding in which it is to be judged by the NWO.  But the seeds have to be planted. Every time a Catholic newly awakening and leaving the novus ordo cave follows that lead and internalizes the stimulus of the Bishop in White, what could be embedded conditioning is implanted at the root of their newly found faith. Like demolition charges being perversely planted during the construction of a building, that newly built faith could be completely demolished. As such, what many good and faithful Catholics regard as prophecy might in reality be a pre-scripted, reverse-engineered, man-made, mass nightmare yet to come true. We already know that wolves masquerade as our shepherds. Whenever a Vatican spokesman opens his mouth, ipso facto he lies. Why would they have uttered one syllable of truth in 2000? In fact I suspect this is the origin of the Bishop in White – just another lie from the Conciliar Hierarchy’s fib factory.  The scene of the Bishop in White may yet take place, and might not be result of authentic prophecy. We ought be on guard against this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s