Ever hear one among the well-intentioned brethren of the Faith tee-up the following as a gambit for a theological chat? “Those who say that everything was fine in the Church up until 1962 are kidding themselves, the Church had problems before then, you know.” Such clever non-sequiturs can be irritating distractions to substantive conversation, and when used as such can be effectively refuted by the analogy (and very possibly the spiritual reality) of Holy Mother as assault victim. This rejoinder gets things back on track, fast, and flows like this. “What if we applied what you’re saying in the case of a woman who has been assaulted? Would we say about her, ‘you know, she wasn’t perfect. She had a lot of problems in her life up until the day she was raped.’” The former term has no bearing on the latter, except that it tends to impute culpability to the victim. While quite true that the visible Church has always had problems due to the fallen natures of her members, such a truism adds very little to the understanding of her present passion. However, when genuinely seeking for causes and explanations, the same gambit can be used to launch an authentic and productive inquiry: that our increasingly dire present took root long before 1962, or 1958, 1903, 1871, 1820, or even 1789.
Tracing its matter back over seven hundred years to Spain, the source for today’s topic identifies the attempt by crypto-judaic converts (a.k.a. Marranos) to smuggle the Kabbalah, (or more precisely, the source text for kabbalistic thinking) into the bosom of the Church[1]. Having been highly successful, this centuries-long, stealthy offensive against the Faith may yet still gain more ground before an unforeseen miracle heralds our deliverance.
Writing in French, author Youseff Hindi recently has had translated the following article: Subverting the Church: Judaism, Kabbalah and Vatican II, linked here. Other than his country of origin being Morocco, locating online biographical data for the author proved elusive, but a cross-referencing of his source material demonstrates a use both faithful to said sources’ contexts and relevance. Additionally, although decidedly subjective, is the resonance of Hindi’s text with senses conveyed by other authors’ treatments of similar topics such as Pinay, DePoncins, Hoffman and Jones. Hindi contends that those who infiltrated the Kabbalah into Catholicism have done so with the intent to subvert the Church under the guise confirming Her doctrines. While summarized and heavily quoted as follows, Hindi’s article is well worth the read, but if a deepening and more convoluted rabbit hole inspires fear, then caveat emptor.
What is the Christian-Kabbalah?
The Christian-Kabbalah was the gnostic, pseudo-mystical (diabolical, occultist) portion of the Babylonian Talmud falsified by crypto-Judaic-Kabbalist converts, gaining fully Catholic adherents by around 1450. The purpose for falsifying it was to forge a non-existent consistency between its ancient pagan contents and Catholic dogma. Pico della Mirandola is a singular historical figure in the covert injection of Kabbalism into the visible Church. Born and baptized Catholic, he is described by Hindi as a “Trojan Horse” who offered a syncretism of all sciences and religions. Hindi cites Judaic author Gersham Sholem quoting Pico, “No science can better convince us of the divinity of Jesus Christ than magic and the Kabbalah.” Did he repent, or was he condemned? Unfortunately, as Michael Hoffman relates, “Pope Alexander VI exonerated him of all imputations of heresy, in the Pope’s Brief of June 18, 1493.”[2] According to Sholem again cited by Hindi, the central concept is “that esoteric Judaism identifies with Christianity and confirms it.” This is the essential error of Christian-Kabbalism, driving that double-minded, evolutionist novus ordo mentality which ever mimics the Faith, but always manages to deviate from it.
Jacob Frank: Kabbalistic-Christian Apostle
Hindi continues his overview in eighteenth century Poland where Jacob Frank, kabbalist and rabbi falsely converted along with a large number of followers, all having the intent of destroying the Church from within. Hindi describes the uniquely gnostic operation targeting the ruin of the Faith by way of previously unknown revelation
We find in frankism and especially in Junius Frey, the cousin of Jacob Frank (see my work: La mystique de la laïcité {Trans.: The Mystique of Secularism}), an all-too-famous religious syncretism, backed by Pico della Mirandola, which not only appeared to be Christian, but also sought to reveal the “true” religion of Jesus by destroying every orthodoxy, every Church, and every dogma.
Here emerge theological currents forming the foundation of assertions such as the Council as a new Pentecost. Revealing the true religion of Jesus might also explain what lies behind Conciliar arrogance in destroying liturgy and sacramental forms under the fraudulent pretense of reconnecting with the Church as she was in the beginning.
Adam Mickiewicz Unveils John Paul the Great Ecumenist
Upon his accession to the papacy in 1978 and stepping out onto the Balcony of St. Peter’s, John Paul hailed nineteenth century Polish Romantic poet Adam Mickiewicz as the embodiment of “Catholic Faith and Freedom”.[3]
The overtone of religious liberty in the above phrasing is the least of the problem here; because although Mickiewicz had hallmarks of credible Catholicity, such as the founding of a religious order, he also bore the taint of things far more troubling. He was friend to Giuseppe Mazzini, the decades-long head of Italian Freemasonry, and in 1817 he founded a secret society called the Philomaths.[4] While Hindi quotes sources somewhat in dispute as to whether Mickiewicz’ wife and mother-in-law were Frankists, the poet’s Christian Kabbalism is manifest
Mickiewicz deeply believed that one cannot detach Christianity from Judaism, and he also believed that the historical settlement of a huge Jewish population in Poland was part of some divine plan. For Mickiewicz, Polish and Jewish fates were inextricably connected. According to Maria Janion, much of this was derived from the Frankist matrix operating in the poet’s imagination.[5]
Why Mickiewicz Matters: Demystification of John Paul the Great Ecumenist
The confused tangle of Christian-Kabbalism and Polish nationalism in the troubled life of Mickiewicz discloses much about the thinking of John Paul II. Hindi cites Msgr. Abbé Francesco Ricossa quoting Mickiewicz
“We are not dealing with reforms, innovations, or religious revolutions, but we expect a new manifestation of the Christian spirit. The butterfly which, at the rising of a spring sun, elevates under the sky, is not a chrysalis reformed, bygone, or innovated; it is always the same being, but raised to a second power of life; it is a transfigured chrysalis. The Christian spirit is ready to exit the Catholic Church: but the official clergy does not have enough light and heat to hatch it …”[6]
And now JP II from L’Osservatore Romano
“Vatican II saw the birth of a new figure of the Church who had remained hidden in the preconciliar Church for two millennia.”[7]
Add to this John Paul’s references to the Council as a new Pentecost, Redemptor Hominis’ “the church of the new advent” and juxtapose it all with the Christian-Kabbalist poet that the Great Ecumenist so publicly admired. A picture thus emerges of a conciliar church that has known exactly what course it placed us on since 1965: a well-concealed endpoint wherein the faux-Christian portion drops away, unveiling the Kabbalah alone as the new guidebook for our pseudo-mystical destiny. The conciliar ideologues aren’t merely making things up as they go about destroying, it just looks that way. They just may be following a carefully pre-mapped path of V2 hermeticism. Similarly, the post conciliar writings, with their contrary-to-logic style, aren’t entirely meaningless when we understand that they may have been written in accord with the Judaic hermeneutic of concealment covered in Hoffman’s Judaism Discovered (pp 149-152). Only the initiated are to receive the ecumenical, self-worshiping gnosis.
Thus when John Paul II entered the Synagogue in Rome and addressed adherents of the Talmud as Catholics’ “elder brethren in the faith,” could he have been any more devious? Knowing that Catholics were either dumbed-down by propaganda, or mentally castrated by relentless, liturgically violent psychological warfare, he sent up a whopper, conflating the true Israel of the Ancient Hebrews with the Talmudic cabal bent on destroying all things of Christ. Most Catholics today can’t differentiate the two. But it would be foolish to think that John Paul II didn’t know. The elder-brethren-in-the-faith could well have been spoken with an additional, hidden meaning intended for Talmudic and Conciliar adepts. In that hidden meaning the word faith referred not to Roman Catholicism, but the faith of convergence between Christianity and Kabbalah, in which the former is corrupted into non-existence by the latter.
Given the obvious difficulties which arise in attempting to call attention to words with concealed meanings, it behooves us to locate explicit statements upon which such suspicions may be legitimately grounded. Once again citing Abbey Ricossa, Hindi provides
The unique privilege of the revelation made to the Hebrew people was that it prepared the final revelation. But an impression remains in this people, which assigns it a role for the future … But in the countries inhabited by our race (Poland) the grains of truth which have come to us were conquered by an effort of the spirit. There remain millions of men belonging to a well-known people, to a people who are the eldest of Europe, the eldest of all civilized peoples, the Jewish people, who, from the depths of the synagogues, have for centuries never ceased to shout cries to which nothing in the world resembles, those cries of which humanity has lost the tradition…[8]
What is most explicit in the final lines above is that John Paul refers to the Talmudic religion of the modern synagogue. Thus the initial lines about the Hebrew people cannot possibly refer to our holy ancestors. Therefore the final revelation might seem to invoke the Apocalypse, but such a reading cannot be squared with the explicit shout-out to the Talmudists at the close. So what then, is this final revelation? What unearthly cry could be emanating from the depths of the Synagogue of a lost tradition? Given the inscrutable and counter-rational nature of the Kabbalah (with or without Christian doctrinal admixtures) only negative conclusions can be drawn: the revelation and tradition mentioned are in no way Catholic. If not Catholic, then what? Given the context of a nominally Catholic pope addressing a thoroughly Talmudic audience, there is a real possibility that the answer lies in whatever secrets are held in the Christian-Kabbalah.
Hindi has provided exhibit A in what lies behind the mask of the Conciliar Religion which at one time looked and sounded Catholic, but year after year takes on the hideous appearance of a gnostic cult. Is it possible that the council put us under Talmudic rule? –Let Bergoglio answer this question.
Christian-Kabbalistic Hermeneutic Alive and Well
Well-intentioned evangelists of the fourteenth century made the mistake of attempting to use the Kabbalah as proof texts for the Holy Faith. The Holy Ghost confirms the Holy Faith. Catholics having acted contrariwise committed a gross tactical blunder that created equivalence between truth and error. Accepting the premise that the Kabbalah is a proof text would create a bi-directional flow of ideas: if the Kabbalah is proof for the faith, then why can it not be used as foundation for doctrine, or the idea that doctrine develops? This problem constitutes not merely the hazard that static theological errors penetrate Catholic minds, but even more so that certain modes of thinking be applied to Catholic doctrine. The mental action of viewing Catholicism through a kabbalistic prism would threaten to infect deeply into the tissue of the visible church right into the marrow of her bones. In this way, the most horrendous errors could grow like cancer on the living tissues of the Faith. Also, just as malignant, late stage cancer overtakes the systems of the body to such a degree that the hand of the most skillful physician cannot relieve the patient, the mutated cells overwhelm the healthy. Christian-kabbalistic doctrinal interpretations, for example, can develop senses and meanings completely apart from that which was originally set forth. Internal contradictions are part and parcel of Christian-kabbalistic thinking, and defy rational discourse and pedagogy. In these and other ways, the application of kabbalistic methods to any dogma of the Faith can warp from within the very Catholic mind being catechized. This cancer-like condition, in which tradition is obscured by illegitimate kabbalistic hermeneutics, describes very well our weakened state. As Father Linus Clovis has said, the Church and the anti-church occupy the same liturgical, sacramental and juridical space. Reverting to the above medical analogy, we might say that the cancer clings to and crowds out the vital tissue, and that what once were healthy Catholic cells have mutated. Have seven centuries of occult contact with a carcinogenic Christian-Kabbalah brought on the condition?
Dogma heretofore has been untouched in writing, but when studied through a Christian-Kabbalistic prism in which meanings can shift and contradictions are regarded as relevatory, then the Faith itself has for many been made void. Yet today this Rubicon has been crossed with a heretical pronouncement of Authentic Magisterium, contradicting Our Blessed Lord’s own words. Who else contradicted Our Savior on the topic of divorce and remarriage? Was it the Pharisees and their traditions of men? The Mishnah was alive and well in its oral form even then. What can heresy promulgated as magisterium mean other than a new phase of unmasking for the conciliar infiltrators? Is the Church fighting against Christian-Kabbalists within?
[1] https://www.transnotitia.com/subverting-the-church/#_edn9
[2] https://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/page5/page5.html
[3] http://www.angelfire.com/journal2/post/john-paul.html -Referring to Hindi’s online source directly
[4] Op cit.
[5] http://culture.pl/en/article/does-jacob-frank-hold-a-key-to-polish-culture-0
[6] Hindi, op. cit.
[7] Hindi, op. cit.
[8] Hindi, op. cit.
cognitive gateway 
One thought on “Ecumenism Unmasked”